Report on Niagara Co SPCA
January 30, 2012
A report detailing the results of an investigation done by the SPCA Serving Erie County into allegations of wrongdoing against the Niagara County SPCA in NY has been published. Here are some of the points included in that report.
The shelter’s software was not being used fully and records were incomplete. The director had attended a conference offering workshops on how to use the shelter’s software shortly after he was hired. Neither the director not the board reviewed the reports generated by the software and hundreds of pets remain unaccounted for. There was a huge disconnect between the hundreds of pets listed in-house and those few listed online. The software provides the shelter the ability to easily sync the in-house records with the online postings but it was never utilized.
The board members and director all believed the shelter was “no kill” but none had ever checked to see if all healthy/treatable pets were being saved. When questioned, one board member defined killing for space as “necessary euthanasia”.
Even though the agency’s by-laws require an annual financial contribution by members of the board, approximately half the board members had made no donations in 2011.
The director was surprised to learn that his shelter had killed at least 473 cats and 100 dogs between October 1 and December 15, 2011. He never reviewed data on intakes, killings or RTOs – only adoptions.
Per the director, the vet tech made up the kill list and he reviewed the dogs on the list with the tech because sometimes staff would ask him why a particular dog was killed. Since nobody ever asked about the dead cats, he didn’t bother making himself aware of their killings. A review of records revealed that the director was in fact only reviewing some of the dogs on the kill list, not all as he had stated.
The techs were killing conscious pets via heartstick, using a drug called Rompun first which caused the pets to vomit but did not sedate them. Treatable pets were killed and killing for space was commonplace. Pets were killed in view of living animals. The techs were told not to list “space” as a reason for killing so they would try to find something else to use as an excuse for killing such as bad teeth.
The drivers from the shelter who were sent to investigate claims of animal cruelty are not Peace Officers and have no power to bring charges against offenders. Sometimes animals were seized from cruel conditions but were returned since charges were never brought.
The cat room at the shelter is kept locked to keep the public out. When it was suggested to the director that he unlock the door and let adopters in to see and touch the cats, he refused saying that touching cats leads to the spread of disease within the population. The shelter accepts feral cats, holds them for the stray holding period, then kills them. The director did not want to stop accepting feral cats from the people who regularly brought them in as it would mean a loss of income.
A litter of very young puppies was being housed in the stray area next to a dog whose kennel sign said “rabies suspect” on it.
The overall impression of the shelter is one of dysfunctional relationships, childish behavior and lack of leadership resulting in the suffering and needless killing of pets.
These are some direct quotes lifted from the report:
As NCSPCA is the largest organization in the county, meaning that it handles the most animals, it has a moral obligation to reach out to any and all that can help, regardless of differences of opinion.
Providing services for animal control while operating under the mission to protect animals creates two entirely different platforms for the organization and can seriously impede progress to meet the stated mission of the NCSPCA.
For a humane agency to be the “dog catchers” of the community, to be collecting fees and fines for the government, to house dogs involved in complaints, (such as dangerous dogs for long periods of time), does not align with animal protection. There is currently a dog that was seized as a dangerous dog in early September 2011 being “cared” for at the NCSPCA. The dog has lived in a small kennel for almost five months, barking and snarling at anyone who approaches him. The dog is living a miserable existence with no touching, walking, kennel enrichment, or companionship. That an SPCA is keeping this animal under these circumstances cannot be acceptable.
[T]here is a veterinarian on the board who has never looked at the controlled substance logs, has never asked to see procedures such as euthanasia performed, never attended any shelter medicine workshop, webinar, or attended other veterinary medical educational forums that deal with the operation of a shelter.
There are no SOPs at NCSPCA for general animal care/handling/feral cats/animal health care/incoming exams/vaccination protocols/sterilization/disease control and sanitation/isolation/feeding protocols/zoonoses/bite case protocol/euthanasia paperwork method and disposal of the bodies.
The NCSPCA does not have any SOPs with regards to adoption selection criteria or behavioral assessments.
The conditions which automatically lead to a verdict of euthanasia are parvo, distemper, feral, FIV and FeLV.
The NCSPCA does not have any SOP’s with regards to the adoption process.
Hard work and hard decisions need to be made by those in positions to shape the future of this organization.
Those are the final words of the report. What actions will be taken by the Niagara Co SPCA as a result of this report remain to be seen.